<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Road Rage (Part 3)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3/comment-page-1#comment-26499</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/?p=337#comment-26499</guid>
		<description>#6 - yes, &quot;jaywalking&quot; is illegal. but &quot;jaywalk&quot; isn&#039;t a legal description. to jaywalk is to cross the street illegaly. that&#039;s the whole definition.

anyhow, from SC Code of Laws, Title 56, Chapter 5:

SECTION 56-5-3110. Pedestrian obedience to traffic-control devices and traffic regulations. 

(a) A pedestrian shall obey the instructions of any official traffic-control device specifically applicable to him unless otherwise directed by a police officer. 

(b) Pedestrians shall be subject to traffic and pedestrian-control signals as provided in Sections 56-5-970 and 56-5-990. 

(c) At all other places pedestrians shall be accorded the privileges and shall be subject to the restrictions stated in this chapter. 

... blah, blah, blah ...

SECTION 56-5-3210. Penalties for violating Sections 56-5-2720, 56-5-3190, or 56-5-3200. 

A person who violates any of the provisions of Sections 56-5-3190, 56-5-3200, or 56-5-2720 is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be punished by a fine not exceeding twenty-five dollars or imprisonment for not exceeding ten days.

so, $25 fine or ten days in jail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6 &#8211; yes, &#8220;jaywalking&#8221; is illegal. but &#8220;jaywalk&#8221; isn&#8217;t a legal description. to jaywalk is to cross the street illegaly. that&#8217;s the whole definition.</p>
<p>anyhow, from SC Code of Laws, Title 56, Chapter 5:</p>
<p>SECTION 56-5-3110. Pedestrian obedience to traffic-control devices and traffic regulations. </p>
<p>(a) A pedestrian shall obey the instructions of any official traffic-control device specifically applicable to him unless otherwise directed by a police officer. </p>
<p>(b) Pedestrians shall be subject to traffic and pedestrian-control signals as provided in Sections 56-5-970 and 56-5-990. </p>
<p>(c) At all other places pedestrians shall be accorded the privileges and shall be subject to the restrictions stated in this chapter. </p>
<p>&#8230; blah, blah, blah &#8230;</p>
<p>SECTION 56-5-3210. Penalties for violating Sections 56-5-2720, 56-5-3190, or 56-5-3200. </p>
<p>A person who violates any of the provisions of Sections 56-5-3190, 56-5-3200, or 56-5-2720 is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be punished by a fine not exceeding twenty-five dollars or imprisonment for not exceeding ten days.</p>
<p>so, $25 fine or ten days in jail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (William) Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3/comment-page-1#comment-26434</link>
		<dc:creator>(William) Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/?p=337#comment-26434</guid>
		<description>Japan has a nice attitute to zebra crossings from what I&#039;ve seen (in Sendai and Tokyo). In addition to crossings going 4 ways around a crossroads they complete the whole thing with two crossings going along the diagonals! Excellent efficiency. I think they use black and white stripes much like the UK, and, of course, they drive on the left like us too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan has a nice attitute to zebra crossings from what I&#8217;ve seen (in Sendai and Tokyo). In addition to crossings going 4 ways around a crossroads they complete the whole thing with two crossings going along the diagonals! Excellent efficiency. I think they use black and white stripes much like the UK, and, of course, they drive on the left like us too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geofftech</title>
		<link>http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3/comment-page-1#comment-26421</link>
		<dc:creator>geofftech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/?p=337#comment-26421</guid>
		<description>And &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%27s_eye_%28road%29&quot;&gt;cats eyes&lt;/a&gt; in the UK are cool too! They have different colours depending on what the road is:

&lt;font color=&quot;gray&quot;&gt;White&lt;/font&gt; for the centre of a road.
&lt;font color=&quot;red&quot;&gt;Red&lt;/font&gt;  along the hard shoulder of a motorway
&lt;font color=&quot;orange&quot;&gt;Orange&lt;/font&gt;  along the edge of a central reservation,
and &lt;font color=&quot;green&quot;&gt;Green&lt;/font&gt;  denoting the exit/entrance to a slip road at junctions.

The ones I&#039;ve seen here in the US have all just been plain white all the time.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%27s_eye_%28road%29">cats eyes</a> in the UK are cool too! They have different colours depending on what the road is:</p>
<p><font color="gray">White</font> for the centre of a road.<br />
<font color="red">Red</font>  along the hard shoulder of a motorway<br />
<font color="orange">Orange</font>  along the edge of a central reservation,<br />
and <font color="green">Green</font>  denoting the exit/entrance to a slip road at junctions.</p>
<p>The ones I&#8217;ve seen here in the US have all just been plain white all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian (the voice of reason)</title>
		<link>http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3/comment-page-1#comment-26375</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian (the voice of reason)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/?p=337#comment-26375</guid>
		<description>Cats eyes sink into their box when they are driven over by a car. They have a sloped front and rear guide, which I imagine would have the same effect with a snow plough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cats eyes sink into their box when they are driven over by a car. They have a sloped front and rear guide, which I imagine would have the same effect with a snow plough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geofftech</title>
		<link>http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3/comment-page-1#comment-26345</link>
		<dc:creator>geofftech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 02:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/?p=337#comment-26345</guid>
		<description>#4 - In South Africa, they call traffic lights &quot;Robots&quot;.  Straight up.

#5 - Scott, but in snows in England too!  And I don&#039;t recall it being much of an issue there.    I know it&#039;s just &#039;different&#039;, but when you&#039;ve grown up as I have in the UK where the road signs are plenitful and the road markings are all over the place, it&#039;s strange driving round in a land where there seems to be only half of the signs/markings to what I&#039;m used to.

It&#039;s better that driving round in Malta as I did once many years ago, where there were like - umm, NO road signs whatsover. None. Zilcho.  Nul Points.   That was damn confusing and caused many an argument between the driver and navigator ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 &#8211; In South Africa, they call traffic lights &#8220;Robots&#8221;.  Straight up.</p>
<p>#5 &#8211; Scott, but in snows in England too!  And I don&#8217;t recall it being much of an issue there.    I know it&#8217;s just &#8216;different&#8217;, but when you&#8217;ve grown up as I have in the UK where the road signs are plenitful and the road markings are all over the place, it&#8217;s strange driving round in a land where there seems to be only half of the signs/markings to what I&#8217;m used to.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s better that driving round in Malta as I did once many years ago, where there were like &#8211; umm, NO road signs whatsover. None. Zilcho.  Nul Points.   That was damn confusing and caused many an argument between the driver and navigator &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shemsi</title>
		<link>http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3/comment-page-1#comment-26337</link>
		<dc:creator>Shemsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/?p=337#comment-26337</guid>
		<description>Is there a such thing as jay-walking in SC? I know there isn&#039;t in TX. There are crosswalks, but there&#039;s no legal requirement to cross at crosswalks. It&#039;s not even that unusual to see people walking (running) across freeways. I haven&#039;t seen that here, but I have noticed people crossing city streets wherever they feel like it. 

It was nice in Atlanta that they had signs saying that cars should stop for pedestrians on crosswalks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a such thing as jay-walking in SC? I know there isn&#8217;t in TX. There are crosswalks, but there&#8217;s no legal requirement to cross at crosswalks. It&#8217;s not even that unusual to see people walking (running) across freeways. I haven&#8217;t seen that here, but I have noticed people crossing city streets wherever they feel like it. </p>
<p>It was nice in Atlanta that they had signs saying that cars should stop for pedestrians on crosswalks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottb</title>
		<link>http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3/comment-page-1#comment-26327</link>
		<dc:creator>scottb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/?p=337#comment-26327</guid>
		<description>It just occured to me that part of the reason we don&#039;t have street markings used as prominently as in Europe is because in a lot of North America (the manly bits anyway) the streets are covered in snow for quite a bit of the winter, so any painting on the pavement is rendered utterly useless.  This results in us having to rely on elevated signs. It really is not a big deal if you have grown up with it, so Geoff, just keep at it and adapt.  It will get easier.

I will admit, though, that roundabouts are much preferable to intersections controlled by lights, although the cloverleaf is a good system if so many people weren&#039;t such wimpy drivers.  I hate the rampant proliferation of stop lights, and my pet peeve, the four-way stop. They should be four-way yields (ie. roundabouts).

Also, when it rains here it can be impossible to tell where the lane markings are because we have no cat&#039;s eyes on the road -- they would be destroyed whenever a snow plow does its thing -making night drives in the wet quite harrowing.  At least we don&#039;t get that much rain though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just occured to me that part of the reason we don&#8217;t have street markings used as prominently as in Europe is because in a lot of North America (the manly bits anyway) the streets are covered in snow for quite a bit of the winter, so any painting on the pavement is rendered utterly useless.  This results in us having to rely on elevated signs. It really is not a big deal if you have grown up with it, so Geoff, just keep at it and adapt.  It will get easier.</p>
<p>I will admit, though, that roundabouts are much preferable to intersections controlled by lights, although the cloverleaf is a good system if so many people weren&#8217;t such wimpy drivers.  I hate the rampant proliferation of stop lights, and my pet peeve, the four-way stop. They should be four-way yields (ie. roundabouts).</p>
<p>Also, when it rains here it can be impossible to tell where the lane markings are because we have no cat&#8217;s eyes on the road &#8212; they would be destroyed whenever a snow plow does its thing -making night drives in the wet quite harrowing.  At least we don&#8217;t get that much rain though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Alpha</title>
		<link>http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3/comment-page-1#comment-26320</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Alpha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/?p=337#comment-26320</guid>
		<description>Did you know the same guy who suggested that roundabouts were called, well, erm, &lt;em&gt;&quot;Roundabouts&quot; &lt;/em&gt;also suggested traffic lights should be called &lt;em&gt;&quot;Stop and Gos&quot;&lt;/em&gt;. One stuck, the other didn&#039;t!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know the same guy who suggested that roundabouts were called, well, erm, <em>&#8220;Roundabouts&#8221; </em>also suggested traffic lights should be called <em>&#8220;Stop and Gos&#8221;</em>. One stuck, the other didn&#8217;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3/comment-page-1#comment-26308</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/?p=337#comment-26308</guid>
		<description>Another weird thing about zebra crossings here is that cars can still turn right. Loads of times now i have started to walk when the green man is showing and nearly been run over by some maniac driver. Even though i thought the point of zebra crossings was to make it safe for pedestrians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another weird thing about zebra crossings here is that cars can still turn right. Loads of times now i have started to walk when the green man is showing and nearly been run over by some maniac driver. Even though i thought the point of zebra crossings was to make it safe for pedestrians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/2006/10/25/road-rage-part-3/comment-page-1#comment-26297</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geofftech.co.uk/iblog/?p=337#comment-26297</guid>
		<description>Why not jaywalk?  It&#039;s great fun...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not jaywalk?  It&#8217;s great fun&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

